Rheometer
Suppliers

TA Instruments
Brookfield

Rheology Parameters
& Chain Dimensions

Table

Chain Dimensions
Packing Model & Universal Power Laws

In both the melt state and in a theta-solvent, linear flexible polymer chains follow Gaussian statistics, meaning the average conformation can be described as a random walk in three dimensions. As has been shown by Fetters, Lohse et al., the conformational properties of such chains can be linked to the viscoelastic properties by a single parameter, the so called packing length p.1,2 This parameter is a measure for the relative thickness of a polymer chain. It is defined as the occupied volume of a chain Vc divided by its mean-square unperturbed end-to-end distance ⟨R20⟩:

p = M / [⟨R20ρ Na] = Vc / ⟨R20

where M denotes the molecular weight of the polymer, ρ its melt-state density, and Na the Avogadro number. Vc is equal to M/(ρNa). Polymers with a large packing length p exhibit lower elastic energy per chain because larger packing length p means fewer entanglements per chain which results in faster disentanglement at strain and thus in a lower modulus.
As Fetters et al. have shown, many viscoelastic properties of linear polymers can be described by universal power laws of the form G(p) ∼ pn . For example, they found following power law for the plateau modulus GN,0 :4

GN,0 = kT / [nt2p3]

where k denotes the Boltzman constant (k = 1.38 10-23 J/K), T the temperature, ρ  the polymer melt density and nt the number of entanglement strands in a volume with dimensions equal to the diameter of the corresponding reptation tube. Thus, a double logarithmic plot of p against GN,0 (or a linear plot of p-3 against GN,0) should yield a straight line, as it is the case for many linear polymers (see figure below).

CROW logo

 

As has been shown by Ferry et al., the rubbery plateau modulus, GN,0, is inversely proportional to the molecular weight between two successive entanglements:3

GN,0 = 4/5 · ρ R T / Me

Combining the two expressions for GN,0 leads to following power law dependency of the entanglement weight on packing length, entanglement strand density, and melt density:4

Me = ρ Na nt2p3

Thus the entanglement molecular weight of any linear polymer can be effectively calculated when the conformational properties such as the occupied volume of the polymer chain Vc and its root-mean-square unperturbed end-to-end distance 〈R20〉 are known. This finding is not surprising, since ⟨R20⟩ is directly related to the entanglement density νe.5

The Figure below shows a plot of Me/ρ versus p for a number of polymers (see attached Table). The fitted curve is in good agreement with the scaling law.

CROW logo

 

It is also in excellent agreement with the result of Fetters, Lohse and Graessley who found following equation for polyolefins studied in their work:4,6,7

Me/ρ = 361.9 (+/- 31.4) Na p3 = 218 p3 (298K)

References and Notes
  1. L.J. Fetters, D.J. Lohse, D. Richter, T.A. Witten, A. Zirkel, Macromolecules, 27, 4639 (1994)
  2. T.A. Witten, S.T. Milner, Z.-G. Wang, in Multiphase Macromolecular Systems, B.M. Culbertson, Plenum Publ. Corp.: New York (1989)
  3. J.D. Ferry, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, 3rd Ed., John Wiley, New York 1980
  4. R. Krishnamoorti et al., J. Poly. Sci.: Part B: Poly. Phys., 40, 1768–1776 (2002)
  5. Sougheng Wu, Polymer International 29, 229-247 (1992)
  6. L.J. Fetters, D.J. Lohse, W.W., Graessley, J. of Poly. Sci.: Part B: Polymer Physics, Vol. 37, 1023–1033 (1999)
  7. The prefactor of 362 is equal to nt2.
  • Summary

    Packing Model

    relates the sizes of a polymer coil to its entanglement length and to its rheological properties in the melt state.

  • The packing model is based on the concept of packing length p which represents the relative thickness of a polymer chain.

  • The parameter p is defined as the ratio of the occupied volume of a polymer chain (Vc) and its mean-square end-to-end distance 〈R20⟩ .

  • Both 〈R20⟩ and Vc are proportional to the degree of polymerization N, so p is independent of the molecular weight. Its value is typically between 2 and 10 Å.

  • Polymers with a large packing length exhibit lower elastic energy per chain because a larger packing length means fewer entanglements per chain. 

  •   Read More